The Four Questions of Passover

American Patriot posted four questions asking our opinions on a few issues, and I am obliging him with a response. These are my responses:

1) What are your opinions (generally speaking – you do not have to write a 50 page essay) of our Founding Documents and their relevance to modern day U.S.?

I believe the founding documents were a framework for our country. The founding fathers (a bunch of f*cking racists with a handful of good ideas1) gave us the tools to change that framework as the times change though. I wish the amendment process would be used much more, instead of just making “laws.” From this point on, I will no longer put laws in quotation marks, but if I talk about federal laws, know that I am air quoting around them in a condescending fashion. One example, at risk of sounding like a hippie, would be medical marijuana prohibition. How do they justify the fact that they had to amend the constitution to make alcohol illegal, and then just include medical marijuana under some blanketing of interstate commerce?

2) Do you believe in a ‘living constitution’?

Do I believe that some things, such as what is considered a liberty and a right require a flexible view along with the evolution of society? Yes, especially with the evolution of technology, and how it can be abused to infringe on personal privacy (Fusion Centers). Do I believe that the Supreme Court should inject their bias into decisions? No. I do not agree with many federal laws that are made by just using their own opinions of vaguely worded amendments to justify their enforcement. I believe that if the country expects us to follow the law, then they should follow the law and do things correctly (amend the constitution). That being said, some things, like the ACA, just wouldn’t get done unless someone took the step and got it done, and I do believe that health care is a right of all people. I think that health care could be better done on a state by state basis though, and the president has made this an option to all states (I loved this decision, although I expect many won’t take him up on it because they don’t have any better ideas). There are some things that cannot be done on a local government basis though, like environmental protection. If states were allowed to make the decision, then other states, down the river or in the direction of prevailing winds, could be the ones taking the brunt of the damages. Although I haven’t been explicit, you may have guessed than I am not a very religious man, because religion sticks too firmly to ideas rooted in the past. I believe that knowledge of history is vital and important but dogmatic adherence to past principles, in the church as well as government, should be frowned upon. Societies change over time, it is guaranteed and unstoppable, and with these changes our society requires a form of government that is as dynamic.

3) What do you think a ‘right’ is and what are basic ‘human rights’ as you see it?

A really complex issue, it’s easier to see when rights are being infringed than to come up with a list of rights. So here I go… I’ll steal and expand on Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness (hey, I wrote about that one). Life would be food, shelter, clothing, health care, clean air, clean water, and education2. Liberty is a bit trickier, but I would include protection of free speech, religion, race, gender, sexual orientation, mandatory gun ownership and other similar issues I’m forgetting. Pursuit of happiness is pretty much covered under everything else, again citing Denmark as my example.

4) Where do you draw the line between ‘rights’ that need to be protected by the government and ‘wants’ that should be individual responsibility?

I think that local governments are ideally/uniquely situated to protect rights, since they are in more direct contact with the people. Although without the federal government stepping up on things like civil rights, we might still be stuck in a backwards country in that respect. In terms of wants, I wouldn’t consider “things” a right (the rate of trampoline and Jet Ski ownership in Denmark is disgustingly low) even though they make some people happy.

Kenny "F*cking" Powers

[1] Tosh, Daniel, perf. Happy Thoughts. 2011. DVD.
[2] Our system sucks, but this isn’t the place to expand on that.

Advertisements

About acedizzle

talking to myself.
This entry was posted in Blog Wars and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to The Four Questions of Passover

  1. Sorry factoseintolerant. I was extremely busy over the week end and did not even check my blog to see that you responded.
    I will read it carefully.

    By the way, I responded to your comment regarding the ROIC of healthinsurance co.s
    http://defendourconstitution.blogspot.com/

  2. I just poseted a comment but couldn’t see it so just in case I am posting again. I was very busy over the past 3 days so didn’t even see your post. I’ll read and comment on my blog.
    BTW, here is a reply to your comment regarding health insurance co. ROICs:
    http://defendourconstitution.blogspot.com/2011/04/blog-war-declared-intro.html#comments

  3. Sorry factoseintolerant. I am not ignoring you but between the tax deadline, work, family, and a very lengthy response (hope your eyes do not pop out – and that you have at least half an hour or so to spare), I have not posted yet.
    I think, realistically, by Friday I will have the post. I could have posted it in sections but I think it should be read all at once to put everything in the right context.

  4. At long last, Part III has been posted. It talks about founding principles and American exceptionalism. It is more directly relevant to our debate than the first two sections.

    I am also done with Part IV (about slavery and racism of founders) but I will wait a day to post it. After that I will have Part V that will be dedicated to the flexibility of the constitution type issues (I am almost done with that section – expect to publish it by early next week)
    Here is the link to Part III:
    http://defendourconstitution.blogspot.com/2011/05/deconstruction-of-four-questions-of.html

  5. Sorry about the delay. Got real busy, but here it is finally: Part V regarding the Constitution.
    http://defendourconstitution.blogspot.com/2011/05/deconstruction-of-four-questions-of_27.html

    I will have a conclusion as Part VI next week.
    Feel free to reply whenever (but please leave me a comment on my blog so I know you did)

  6. Ok factose. I am finally done with Part VI – the summary.
    Fire away.
    http://defendourconstitution.blogspot.com/

    p.s. hope your exams/classes went well

  7. Hi factose

    hope all is fine with you.
    Any reactions to my five-part reply to you yet?
    Best wishes.

  8. Factose,

    did they kidnap you or are you having too much summer fun to respond to me. Maybe writing your own little novella?
    Hope all is going well.

    AmPat

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s